Skip to content

Industries We Serve

Any facility that stores or processes a flammable or toxic material in quantity needs consequence modelling

And in most jurisdictions the law requires it.

Who uses AgniKawach

Five kinds of reader, one requirement

  • Risk and safety consultancies

    The engineers who produce most of the world's consequence and risk studies, for whom licence cost caps how much work each engineer can deliver.

  • Plant operators

    Refineries, terminals, chemical plants and distribution networks with a statutory obligation and an existing budget for it.

  • Engineering and design firms

    Consequence modelling drives siting, spacing, blast protection and fire protection specification.

  • Regulators and emergency planning authorities

    Including hazard mapping during an incident, which the traditional toolchain cannot support.

  • Universities and research institutions

    For teaching and research on the platform engineers will meet in industry.

Sectors

Where we work, and what governs the risk there

  • Jet fire

    Oil and gas

    Refineries, pipelines, upstream facilities onshore and offshore.

  • Jet fire

    Gas distribution networks

    City gas distribution, transmission pipelines and compressed natural gas stations, where the network runs under streets and the risk assessment is required before it is laid.

  • Vapour cloud explosion

    Petrochemicals and chemical parks

    Large integrated sites where one release can escalate across a plant, and where congested layouts amplify explosion effects well beyond what simple methods predict.

  • Dense gas dispersion

    Fertilisers and agrochemicals

    Anhydrous ammonia storage and handling, which is both toxic and, in a large release, a dense gas.

  • Cryogenic release

    LNG and cryogenic terminals

    Import, storage, regasification and transfer, where phase change governs the outcome.

  • Flash fire

    Hydrogen and green ammonia

    Electrolysis plants, pipelines, storage and refuelling. Hydrogen behaves unlike the fuels most existing tools were built around, and the world is about to build this infrastructure at scale. The safety case has to be built alongside it.

  • Pool fire

    Ports, terminals and bulk storage

    Bulk liquid terminals, tank farms, chemical warehousing and bunkering. Large inventories held close to people, and often close to each other.

  • Escalation

    Power generation and energy storage

    Gas and thermal generation, and battery energy storage, where thermal runaway is the concern.

  • Pool fire

    Pharmaceuticals and fine chemicals

    Solvent fires, toxic releases and combustible dust.

  • Flash fire

    Semiconductors and electronics

    Fabrication plants running silane, hydrogen and toxic specialty gases inside occupied buildings. The inventories are small and the consequences are not.

  • Toxic dispersion

    Food, beverage and cold chain

    Anhydrous ammonia refrigeration in cold stores, dairies, breweries and processing plants — one of the most common toxic release scenarios in industry.

  • Dense gas dispersion

    Water and wastewater treatment

    Chlorine and sulphur dioxide held at treatment works, usually inside a populated area, where the receptor is the neighbourhood.

  • Explosion

    Mining, metals and cement

    Smelter and furnace fuel gas systems, bulk oxygen and ammonia, and combustible dust in handling and milling.

  • Fireball

    Defence and energetic materials

    Propellant storage, explosive handling and related facilities. Private deployment is available where it is required.

  • Toxic dispersion

    Nuclear facilities

    Conventional chemical hazards on nuclear sites, including chlorine, ammonia and hydrogen handling.

The frameworks we build for

The same questions, asked differently in each jurisdiction

Consequence modelling requirements differ in detail across the world but ask the same questions. AgniKawach is designed to produce output that fits the framework in front of you.

Europe
Seveso and COMAH major accident hazard requirements.
United States
OSHA process safety management and EPA risk management planning.
India
PNGRB quantitative risk assessment and emergency response requirements, PESO major hazard installation requirements, OISD standards, and national disaster management requirements.
Gulf, Asia Pacific and elsewhere
National major hazard frameworks, and the international standards commonly applied alongside them.

Where a jurisdiction has its own reporting format, our aim is to support it directly rather than leave the engineer to reformat by hand.

Talk to us

If you are an operator, a consultant, a regulator or a research partner, we would like to hear from you.