The Platform
The engineer makes the decisions. The platform carries the work between them.
Consequence modelling has always been the slow, expensive part of a safety study. Geometry is rebuilt for every tool. Results are carried by hand from one program to the next. The report is assembled at the end. The physics may be sound, but the process is long, and every manual step is a place where an error can enter.
The platform removes that friction.
The company and the product
AgniKawach is the company. The platform is what it builds.
This website is AgniKawach Safety Solutions Private Limited’s own: what we are building, who is building it, and the evidence behind it. The platform is a separate product. It will run at its own address and under its own name, and it is in development — so there is nothing to log in to here, and this page describes what it does rather than showing it running.
The calculators under Tools are screening demonstrations that run in your own browser. They are not the platform, and they are not what a study on it looks like.
What you can study
A single loss of containment can develop in several directions at once
Which way it develops depends on whether and when the release finds an ignition source. The platform covers every branch.
Loss of containment
One event. Everything to the right is a way the same release can develop, and a safety case has to consider all of them.
Immediate ignition
The release burns where it escapes.
Jet fire
Ignited pressurised release
Pool fire
Burning liquid spill
Delayed ignition
A cloud forms first, then finds a source. What the cloud is sitting in decides which of the two you get.
Vapour cloud explosion
Blast overpressure in congested plant
Flash fire
Transient vapour cloud burn
No ignition
The cloud disperses. For a toxic material this is the governing case, not the mild one.
Gas dispersion
Flammable and toxic clouds, including dense gas behaviour
Cryogenic release
LNG, hydrogen and other cryogens, where phase change governs the spread
And then it starts again
A fire that reaches another vessel is a new loss of containment. This is where a single failure becomes a plant-wide event, and it is the part simple methods leave out.
BLEVE and fireball
Vessel failure under fire
Structural escalation
Effects on adjacent equipment
Hazard diagrams are schematic representations of each outcome type, not simulation results.
All of them come from one description of the facility and one description of the release; the risk assessment follows from the results rather than being assembled separately.
Levels of analysis
Two levels of analysis, one platform
Not every question deserves the same answer. Screening a hundred possible releases across a plant is one job. Building the detailed case for the release that governs the risk is another.
The platform does both, in one place. Fast analysis for screening and for the frequency work a quantitative risk assessment needs. High-fidelity computational fluid dynamics for the cases that carry the decision. The engineer moves between them without rebuilding anything.
Delivered through a browser
Nothing to install, nothing to maintain. Computing capacity scales with the work rather than sitting idle between studies. Teams share a project rather than passing files, and improvements reach every user at once.
Data isolated between clients. Encrypted in transit and at rest. Held in the region the customer requires.
Reports in the format your regulator expects
A safety study is only finished when it is accepted. The platform produces the reporting output the relevant framework requires, with the record of what was run carried inside it: inputs, assumptions, solver version, and the validation case behind each number. A reviewer can establish exactly what produced any result, with nothing to reconstruct.
Our approach
What we decided to build differently
Built for modern computing
Graphics processor computing and adaptive meshing, in the design from the start rather than bolted on afterwards. That is what puts high-fidelity analysis inside a working week.
Physics that reflects the real site
Weather, terrain and plant congestion decide where a hazard goes. The platform models the site as it is, not a generic average of one.
Evidence, not assertion
Every capability is validated against experiment before release, and the evidence is published.
Assistance where it belongs
Machine assistance speeds up study setup and report drafting. The physics stays untouched, because the physics is the product.
Want to see it?
We are working with a small number of early partners.
If you would like a demonstration, please get in touch.
Talk to us
If you are an operator, a consultant, a regulator or a research partner, we would like to hear from you.